December 15, 2019 The Newspaper Serving LGBT Los Angeles

In Trump’s America, the Hippocratic Oath Comes Under Threat

On Thursday, January 18, two days after a new “Religious Freedom Day” was declared by the government, the Trump administration announced that religious rights protections would be increased for healthcare workers who decline to practice procedures that they are religiously opposed to, such as abortions and gender confirmation surgeries. Sensing the inherent conflict between this promise and the basis of the Hippocratic oath that all healthcare professionals are made to take to ensure a non-biased approach medicine, writers, activists, and medical professionals took to Twitter to protest the decision.

[email protected]’s proclamation for Religious Freedom Day specifically says that no American should have to obey the law if it conflicts with their religion. Ahistorical and dangerous,” wrote the American Atheists account.

A nurse based in Fishers, Indiana tweeted: “I didn’t become a nurse to pick and choose who I will provide care for. If you have a true servants heart it shouldn’t matter if the patient is black, white, gay, straight, Muslim, Atheist, transgendered and so on. #treatallpatients.”

Meanwhile, Republicans like Virginia Senator Richard Black and Texas Congressman Michael McCaul referenced Jefferson’s 1786 Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom as a historical, and thus legitimate, precedent for Trump’s decision.

Like the infamous Masterpiece Cake Shop decision before it, in which a religious business owner refused to make a gay couple a wedding cake on religious grounds, the controversial choice to pit religious integrity against occupational neutrality creates a confusing, extremely divisive counter to the idea that human rights and religious rights are separate, unequal entities. By placing them together on the same plane, the Trump administration has begun to treat religious doctors, nurses, and healthcare professionals as a protected class. Healthcare workers and medical establishments in general are also, under the new decision, being treated more like private businesses, which are by law entitled to bias, rather than public service institutions.

But does the choice to tie church, state, and hospital together go against the very basis of the medical profession?

The first statute of the original Hippocratic oath is: “To place the good of the patient at the center of my professional practice and, when the gravity of the situation demands, above my own self interest.” The problem is that a term like ‘good’, or even the phrase “self interest,” becomes increasingly subjective and vulnerable to re-definition. If the idea of bias belongs to everyone, it’s possible that everyone can claim themselves to be part of a protected class. But how can you be protected against the promise you yourself made to protect and serve without bias?

The Hippocratic oath wasn’t always seen as a mandatory part of the job for healthcare workers. However, in recent years, it’s become more common, and more crucial, for students to enter the profession by guaranteeing non-biased treatment to patients from all walks of life. According to an article in Georgetown University’s Journal of Health Sciences, in 2012, “100 percent of medical school graduates in the United States swear to some variation of the Hippocratic Oath (as opposed to just 24 percent in 1928.)”

The attitude toward religious freedom protection for healthcare workers has yo-yoed back and forth since 1973’s Roe v Wade victory, with Republican-led governments usually favoring religious protections and Democrat-led administrations scaling back those same protections. The “Church Amendments” were introduced in the 1970s, at the start of Roe v. Wade, to allow medical practitioners to ‘opt out’ of performing abortions if it conflicted with their religious beliefs. Since that time, gender confirmation surgeries have been added to the list of procedures that healthcare workers can choose not to perform due to religious conflict. In 1996, a new act, titled Public Health Service Act 245, underwrote these protections by stipulating that the federal government would not fund hospitals or practices that “discriminated” against workers who refused to perform abortions.

The use of the word ‘discrimination’ as it applies to, in this case, the original discriminating party, is interesting in light of Trump’s recent decisions regarding transgender individuals in the military and healthcare in general. As the question of what makes a protected class grows murkier, Americans find themselves having to choose between personal morality and collective democracy.

Related Posts

HEALTH FEATURE: Preventing Sudden Hearing Loss at Alexander Audiology

December 9, 2019

December 9, 2019

Santa Monica’s Dr. Melissa Alexander discusses sudden idiopathic hearing loss Sudden idiopathic hearing loss, or sudden deafness, is an unexplained...

HEALTH FEATURE: Holistic Rehabilitation with Gyrotonic at Body Rhythm

December 2, 2019

December 2, 2019

Master Trainer Shevi Baruch helping patients with range of injuries  With more fitness programs and classes available than ever, it’s...

Big Queer Convo Takes on Tobacco Smoking Plight LGBTQ+ Community Faces

November 22, 2019

November 22, 2019

New findings from #Out4Mental Health Statewide Community Survey and UCLA’s LGBTQ Tobacco Study interviews show how factors including homophobia and...

City of WeHo Survey Seeks Public Feedback to End HIV Stigma

November 16, 2019

November 16, 2019

The City of West Hollywood needs the public’s health recording data on HIV stigmatization.  “Stigma and discrimination are potentially the...

Trump Administration Attacks LGBTQ People Yet Again with HHS Proposed Rule

November 4, 2019

November 4, 2019

To kick off Trans Awareness Month, the Trump Administration has outdone itself in trampling over LGBTQ+ folks’ rights. Today, the...

Walking for a Cure

October 17, 2019

October 17, 2019

Lace up your sneakers, Los Angles. The annual AIDS Walk is back and ready to get some steps in. The...

PrEP Now Available Without Prescription in CA

October 14, 2019

October 14, 2019

Access to HIV prevention medications got a little easier. Last week, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill that would allow...

Q&A w/ a Therapist: “How do I Come Out?”

October 10, 2019

October 10, 2019

Tomorrow marks the 30th annual National Coming Out Day. This is the day when folks can come out as LGBTQ+ to friends, family and coworkers. Coming out is a powerful...

COLUMN: When Same-sex Parents Divorce, Who Gets Custody of Frozen Embryos?

October 9, 2019

October 9, 2019

By Debra R. Schoenberg, Esq.  The miracles of modern medicine can offer the gift of life to many same-sex couples...

‘HIVE’ Mentality for Seniors Living with HIV/AIDS

September 18, 2019

September 18, 2019

Celebrate National HIV/AIDS and Aging Awareness Day.  Those in the LGBTQ+ community living in the late ‘80s to the early...

LGBTQ Youth Encouraged to Create Video Shorts for The Trevor Project

September 12, 2019

September 12, 2019

OUR PRIDE Video Fest announced a Call for Entries for videos about metal health, suicide prevention Calling all LGBTQ+ youth...

COLUMN: How to Safely Prep to Bottom

August 22, 2019

August 22, 2019

By Dr. Evan Goldstein, founder of Future Method When it comes to sex, the majority of gay men don’t have access...

COLUMN: Things to Consider Before Gender Confirmation Surgery

August 15, 2019

August 15, 2019

By Dr. Minh N. Ho, M.D., F.A.C.O.G, Medical Director, Reproductive Endocrinologist at Reproductive Sciences Medical Center As more people are...

AIDS Monument in Lincoln Park Approved for Renovation

August 8, 2019

August 8, 2019

AIDS Monument in Lincoln Park has been approved for a renovation yesterday.  The Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks...

Policy Brief Outlines How Trump’s New Healthcare Plan Would Harm LGBTQ+ Community

August 8, 2019

August 8, 2019

The Fenway Institute of Fenway Health recently released a policy brief outlining the harm to LGBTQ+ people likely to result...