Paul Ryan justifies Trump’s immigration ban; Obama ‘put a preference in for sexual orientation’

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) justified the portion of President Trump’s refugee policy that institutes a priority for religious minorities by asserting the Obama administration prioritized refugees facing anti-LGBT persecution — an assertion one LGBT advocate says is totally wrong.

- Advertisement -

Ryan made the comments Thursday during his weekly news briefing when defending Trump’s controversial executive order, which has been criticized as a Muslim ban because it prohibits people from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States.

“This is not a Muslim ban,” Ryan said. “If it were, I would be against it. We are a tolerant, pluralistic country. We are and we will be. It’s really important.”

Ryan recalled a bill the Republican-controlled Congress passed in 2015 that would have banned Syrian refugees from entering the United States amid civil war and atrocities committed by the Islamic State of Syria and Iraq. Forty-seven House Democrats voted in favor of that legislation, including gay Reps. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) and Sean Patrick Maloney (D-N.Y.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), who is bisexual.

“The bill we passed last year, if you recall, after the Paris shooting, it became clear to us that one of the terrorists infiltrated the refugee population coming from Syria,” Ryan said. “So, we wanted to make sure that that didn’t happen in this country. That’s just sort of National Security 101.”

Ryan said the bill came about after lawmakers asked government officials if they could vet Syrian refugees to ensure terrorist attacks like the one in Paris wouldn’t happen in the United States and they said, “‘No. We Can’t.’” Despite Ryan’s words, the Obama administration insisted refugees go through an extreme vetting process removing anyone with potential ties to terrorism.

“And so that’s why we passed legislation with 289 votes — a big, bipartisan bill saying let’s this pause this program until we can figure out how to get it right,” Ryan said. “That’s effectively what this is about.”

The Trump order bars Syrian refugees indefinitely and more generally places a 120-day ban on refugees entering the United States pending review, but when the review is completed institutes a preference for refugees seeking asylum from religious persecution.

Ryan asserted that policy isn’t a religious test — which may be unconstitutional — by asserting the Obama administration made a priority for refugees facing anti-LGBT persecution.

“Presidents always and often put preferences in refugee populations,” Ryan said. “I think President Obama had one for sexual orientation. They didn’t call that a sexual-orientation test. He put a preference in for sexual orientation.”

Ryan made the case a priority for refugees facing religious persecution makes sense because religious minorities, such as Christians in the Middle East as well as Sunni Muslims in Shia countries are being targeted.

“So there’s nothing wrong in saying we’re going to take into account minority religious persecution with our refugee situation,” Ryan concluded.

In 2015, then-White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest indeed stated LGBT people facing persecution overseas would be a priority for refugees coming into the United States, but one of many priority classifications of people, including race and religion.

Earnest made the remarks in response to a request from LGBT advocates led by the Organization for Refuge, Asylum & Migration, or ORAM, to set aside 500 slots for LGBT people facing persecution in the 10,000 additional Syrian refugees former President Obama wanted in the United States.

“There are no quotas that are set aside, but the process that we have implemented does prioritize the cases of those who have been subjected to torture, including like the torture that you described, or might have been singled out for their status as a minority, whether that’s a racial minority or an ethnic minority or a religious minority, or even somebody — an LGBT person,” Earnest said.

Neil Grungras, executive director of ORAM, said “there is no fact” in Ryan’s remarks defending Trump’s immigration order because LGBT people never in fact received a priority.

“It is true that the Obama administration’s 2011 memorandum on LGBT rights worldwide set out several areas of focus including LGBT refugees and asylum seekers,” Grungras said. “However the administration never gave priority of any kind to LGBT refugees. The State Department’s refugee bureau consistently declined to set out a special category for this extremely vulnerable group and also declined to set out a quota or target number. Such was the response to ORAM’s petition calling for admission of 500 LGBT refugees.”

Of the more than 70,000 refugees the Obama administration admitted to the United States last year, Grungras estimated fewer than 200 came in under the LGBT social group category.

—  This article was provided to The Pride Los Angeles by the National Gay Media Association and was written by The Washington Blade.



  1. Hi, I do think this is an excellent blog. I stumbledupon it 😉 I am going to revisit yet
    again since i have saved as a favorite it. Money and freedom is the best way to change, may
    you be rich and continue to guide others.

  2. Hi, I do think your blog might be having internet browser compatibility problems.
    When I look at your blog in Safari, it looks fine however, when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping
    issues. I simply wanted to provide you with a quick heads up!
    Apart from that, excellent site!

  3. Hi I am so delighted I found your webpage, I really found you by accident,
    while I was researching on Digg for something else, Regardless
    I am here now and would just like to say thanks a lot for
    a remarkable post and a all round enjoyable blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to
    read it all at the minute but I have saved it and also added
    your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot
    more, Please do keep up the superb work.

  4. Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your post seem to be
    running off the screen in Ie. I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to
    do with web browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let
    you know. The design look great though! Hope you
    get the problem solved soon. Thanks

  5. I was wondering if you ever considered changing the layout of
    your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to
    say. But maybe you could a little more in the way
    of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for
    only having one or two pictures. Maybe you could space it out better?

  6. First off I would like to say great blog! I had a quick question which I’d like to ask if
    you don’t mind. I was interested to know how you center yourself and clear your mind prior to
    writing. I have had a hard time clearing my
    thoughts in getting my ideas out there. I do enjoy writing however it just seems like
    the first 10 to 15 minutes are usually wasted just trying to
    figure out how to begin. Any ideas or hints? Many thanks!

  7. I believe everything composed made a great deal
    of sense. But, what about this? what if you were to create a awesome title?
    I ain’t suggesting your content is not solid., but what if you added a post title to possibly get folk’s
    attention? I mean Paul Ryan justifies Trump's immigration ban; Obama 'put a preference in for sexual orientation' – The Pride LA is a little boring.
    You might peek at Yahoo’s front page and see how they create news headlines to grab people interested.
    You might try adding a video or a pic or two to grab readers excited about what you’ve got to say.

    Just my opinion, it would bring your website a little livelier.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here