April 2, 2020 The Newspaper Serving LGBT Los Angeles

New Study Tears Down Trump Ban

A new study from the Palm Center, a think tank that focuses on the role of LGBTQ+ people in the military, offers a thorough rebuttal to the Trump administration exclusion of trans people from military service.

U.S. President Donald Trump first announced a ban on trans military personnel via Twitter on July 26, writing, “After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow…[t]ransgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military.” In reality, the president had consulted with neither his generals nor any military experts, and his tweets are directly contradicted by several high-level military reviews, a shared statement by six former U.S. Surgeons General, and a 2016 study by the RAND Corporation, a nonpartisan public policy think tank.

The courts were fast to point this out in the legal challenges that followed the policy change. One federal judge wrote in November, “President Trump’s tweets did not emerge from a policy review,” adding, “A capricious, arbitrary, and unqualified tweet of new policy does not trump the methodical and systematic review by military stakeholders.”

Following multiple legal setbacks, the administration produced a report with a more thorough but equally specious justification, entitled, “Department of Defense Report and Recommendations on Military Service by Transgender Persons.” 

In a 56-page rebuttal, the Palm Center argues that the Pentagon’s report mischaracterized scientific research and made unsupported claims based on a highly-selective sample of data. “This report undertakes that assessment and finds its rationale wholly unpersuasive,” the Palm Center study says.

The study tackles the three main arguments made by the Trump administration. First, that trans military personnel are less fit for service because of diagnoses of gender dysphoria—the clinical term for not identifying with one’s assigned gender at birth. Second, the Pentagon’s report claim that there is “considerable scientific uncertainty” about the effectiveness of treating gender dysphoria, further justifying an exclusive policy towards trans people. Finally, the assertion that medical costs for treating trans folks diagnosed with gender dysphoria runs three times higher than costs for other troops and would overburden the military’s healthcare system.

According to the Palm Center’s evaluation, the Department of Defense (DoD) performs a highly-selective reading of the available research and omitted the majority of scientific findings. Contrary to the DoD’s claims, the scientific and medical communities have concluded that gender dysphoria is treatable and does not justify a ban on transgender service in the military. Both the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Psychological Association (APA) have released statements opposing the Trump administration’s decision.

In a statement responding to the DoD’s report, the AMA accused the Pentagon of having “mischaracterized and rejected the wide body of peer-reviewed research on the effectiveness of transgender medical care.”

The studies that the Pentagon cites in support of the ban actually undermine its case, the Palm Center finds. “Critically, even these four studies, supposedly representing the best evidence documenting the uncertainty about transition-related care’s efficacy, all conclude that such care mitigates symptoms of gender dysphoria,” the Center writes.

In addressing the issue of cost, the Palm Center shows a key flaw in the Pentagon’s cost-calculating approach. The DoD reported that costs for people diagnosed with gender dysphoria are three times higher than for average service people. The problem with this figure, the study says, is that whenever you isolate the costs for a specific medical subset, the results will always be higher than the average cost for the entire military. For instance, you would most likely find a similar price gap if you compared medical costs for people suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder with military personnel as a whole.

The study concludes with a turn towards history. “Just like justifications for prohibitions against women and African Americans in the military as well as the failed DADT policy, the case for banning transgender individuals from the armed forces is not supported by evidence and is unpersuasive,” it says.

Related Posts

WeHo’s High COVID-19 Rate

April 1, 2020

April 1, 2020

City of West Hollywood has highest rate of COVID-19 in LA Countywide, LGBTQ population at risk By Sam Catanzaro As...

Elderly LGBT people in California at high risk for COVID-19 illness

April 1, 2020

April 1, 2020

By Staff Writer 162,000 LGB and 9,000 transgender elderly people in California at high risk for COVID-19 illness, according to...

Los Angeles LGBT Center on Coronavirus Resources

March 22, 2020

March 22, 2020

The Los Angeles LGBT Center has released the following recommendations for members of the LGBTQ+ community during the novel coronavirus...

West Hollywood Mayor John D’Amico Tests Positive for the Coronavirus

March 19, 2020

March 19, 2020

57-year-old mayor in self-quarantine By James Mills West Hollywood Mayor John D’Amico has tested positive for the coronavirus. West Hollywood...

Coronavirus’ Added Risk for LGBTQ+ Communities

March 17, 2020

March 17, 2020

More than 100 LGBTQ+ organizations have signed an open letter outlining the added risk the novel coronavirus poses on the...

Long Beach Pride Postponed

March 17, 2020

March 17, 2020

Event to be rescheduled for later in the year By James Mills Amid coronavirus concerns, both LA Pride and Long...

Find Out What Country Has Banned Conversion Therapy: E.P.I.C Pride show – March 16, 2020

March 17, 2020

March 17, 2020

Highlighting the latest LGBTQ news in Entertainment, Politics, International affairs, and Culture.* Heidi Klum and Tim Gunn co-starring again?* Country...

LA Pride Postponed due to Coronavirus

March 13, 2020

March 13, 2020

Organizers assessing situation By James Mills Amid coronavirus concerns, LA Pride officials announced Thursday, March 12 that it was postponing...

Edify TV: LGBT Participation in the Democratic Primary

March 13, 2020

March 13, 2020

Did you know that nearly 10 percent of Super Tuesday voters identified as LGBT? Learn more in this video made...

E.P.I.C Pride show – March 12, 2020: Trial of Gabriel Fernandez

March 12, 2020

March 12, 2020

E.P.I.C Pride show – March 12, 2020 – Highlighting the latest LGBTQ news in Entertainment, Politics, International affairs, and Culture.*...

Charlotte Awberry’s rendition of “Shallow” goes viral: E.P.I.C Pride show – March 5, 2020

March 6, 2020

March 6, 2020

Highlighting the latest LGBTQ news in Entertainment, Politics, International affairs, and Culture.* Charlotte Awberry’s rendition of “Shallow” goes viral.* Charlotte...

Another State Bans LGBTQ Youth Conversion Therapy

March 6, 2020

March 6, 2020

By Staff Writer This week, another state has banned LGBTQ youth from conversion therapy. On Monday Governor Ralph Northam signed...

MIKA, Lil Nas X and More at GLAAD Awards

March 6, 2020

March 6, 2020

GLAAD, the world’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) media advocacy organization, today announced that recording artist and...

Bollywoods first gay romantic comedy banned, RuPaul’s drag race moving to Showtime? The Pride L.A.: E.P.I.C Pride show – March 2, 2020

March 3, 2020

March 3, 2020

Highlighting the latest LGBTQ news in Entertainment, Politics, International affairs, and Culture.* RuPaul’s drag race moving to Showtime?* Bollywood’s first...

Los Angeles LGBT Center Sets $51K Fundraising Goal For Big 5K Run

March 3, 2020

March 3, 2020

Celebrating its 51st year of helping LGBT people thrive, the Los Angeles LGBT Center has set a goal to raise...